This is excellent!
This is excellent!
Oh and of course he said he was “for the little guy right.” Bullshit. Oink Oink Grunt Grunt.
So let’s do some work via the Register
Ajit Pai, the chief lackie…eerhh, chairman of the FCC, said
“resident Trump and Congress have appropriately invalidated one part of the Obama-era plan for regulating the Internet. Those flawed privacy rules, which never went into effect, were designed to benefit one group of favored companies, not online consumers.”
BULLSHIT on the last part of that sentence, that the rules were “designed to benefit one group of favored companies, not online consumers.”
The rules were developed entirely and absolutely to protect online consumers. They required ISPs to get an opt-in from customers for sensitive information, to offer an opt-out for other uses of that data, and to ensure that they appropriately protected that data.
The other Republican commissioner on the FCC, Mike O’Rielly, had his own statement that, unfortunately, layered bullshit upon bullshit.
“I applaud President Trump and Congress for utilizing the CRA to undo the FCC’s detrimental privacy rules,” he said. “The parade of horribles trotted out to scare the American people about its passage are completely fictitious, especially since parts of the rules never even went into effect. Hopefully, we will soon return to a universe where thoughtful privacy protections are not overrun by shameful FCC power grabs and blatant misrepresentations.”
What O’Rielly does, however, is pinpoint the beating heart of the bullshit: the claim that since something hasn’t happened yet, it means that it won’t happen.
For someone who is a commissioner at a federal regulator, this willful blindness over how the real world works is borderline obnoxious.
Here is the absolute solid reality of what this decision to scrap the FCC rules means:
ISPs were previously able to do what they can do now, ie, sell their customers’ private data.
But they were previously at risk of being investigated by the FTC and then, later, the FCC.
If they had been found to have broken data privacy rules, they faced huge fines and most likely the requirement to get prior approval from the FTC/FCC before doing anything similar in future.
Now, however, there is no backstop. The FTC does not have jurisdiction. And nor does the FCC. The ISPs currently exist in a regulatory-free world.
What this means is significant and it is the source of (Democrat) claims that ISPs will soon be selling your private data and the counter-claims (by Republicans) that people are fear-mongering and inventing problems. Source: Here
Swine — oh wait, that is unfair…to the the swine I mean.
SJ 34 would repeal safeguards that prohibit Internet service providers (ISPs) from sharing data, such as e-mails and web history, with third parties without user consent. It would also do away with transparency requirements, which mandate that ISPs provide easily accessible privacy notices to customers and advanced notice prior to changes…..Assuming Trump signs the measure, Internet providers will be freed from those obligations, which would otherwise have taken effect later this year. With this data, Internet providers can sell highly targeted ads, making them rivals to Google and Facebook, analysts say.
Internet providers also will be free to use customer data in other ways, such as selling the information directly to data brokers that target lucrative or vulnerable demographics.
“ISPs like Comcast, AT&T, and Charter will be free to sell your personal information to the highest bidder without your permission — and no one will be able to protect you,” wrote Gigi Sohn, a former FCC staffer who helped draft the privacy rules, in a recent blog post on the Verge.
Selling your data is merely one of the four ways in which Internet providers intend to make money off consumers. The others include selling you access to the Internet, as they have traditionally done; selling access to media content they’ve acquired by purchasing large entertainment companies; and selling advertising that directly targets you based on the data the provider has collected by watching how you use the Internet and what content you consume.
Here is the roll call Miscreants who voted to repeal. Source Senate.Gov
|Miscreants who voted For Bill||Voted Against||Not Voting|
|Alexander (R-TN)||Baldwin (D-WI)||sakson (R-GA)|
|Barrasso (R-WY)||Bennet (D-CO)||Paul (R-KY)|
|Blunt (R-MO)||Blumenthal (D-CT)|
|Boozman (R-AR)||Booker (D-NJ)|
|Burr (R-NC)||Brown (D-OH)|
|Capito (R-WV)||Cantwell (D-WA)|
|Cassidy (R-LA)||Cardin (D-MD)|
|Cochran (R-MS)||Carper (D-DE)|
|Collins (R-ME)||Casey (D-PA)|
|Corker (R-TN)||Coons (D-DE)|
|Cornyn (R-TX)||Cortez Masto (D-NV)|
|Cotton (R-AR)||Donnelly (D-IN)|
|Crapo (R-ID)||Duckworth (D-IL)|
|Cruz (R-TX)||Durbin (D-IL)|
|Daines (R-MT)||Feinstein (D-CA)|
|Enzi (R-WY)||Franken (D-MN)|
|Ernst (R-IA)||Gillibrand (D-NY)|
|Fischer (R-NE)||Harris (D-CA)|
|Flake (R-AZ)||Hassan (D-NH)|
|Gardner (R-CO)||Heinrich (D-NM)|
|Graham (R-SC)||Heitkamp (D-ND)|
|Grassley (R-IA)||Hirono (D-HI)|
|Hatch (R-UT)||Kaine (D-VA)|
|Heller (R-NV)||King (I-ME)|
|Hoeven (R-ND)||Klobuchar (D-MN)|
|Inhofe (R-OK)||Leahy (D-VT)|
|Johnson (R-WI)||Manchin (D-WV)|
|Kennedy (R-LA)||Markey (D-MA)|
|Lankford (R-OK)||McCaskill (D-MO)|
|Lee (R-UT)||Menendez (D-NJ)|
|McCain (R-AZ)||Merkley (D-OR)|
|McConnell (R-KY)||Murphy (D-CT)|
|Moran (R-KS)||Murray (D-WA)|
|Murkowski (R-AK)||Nelson (D-FL)|
|Perdue (R-GA)||Peters (D-MI)|
|Portman (R-OH)||Reed (D-RI)|
|Risch (R-ID)||Sanders (I-VT)|
|Roberts (R-KS)||Schatz (D-HI)|
|Rounds (R-SD)||Schumer (D-NY)|
|Rubio (R-FL)||Shaheen (D-NH)|
|Sasse (R-NE)||Stabenow (D-MI)|
|Scott (R-SC)||Tester (D-MT)|
|Shelby (R-AL)||Udall (D-NM)|
|Strange (R-AL)||Van Hollen (D-MD)|
|Sullivan (R-AK)||Warner (D-VA)|
|Thune (R-SD)||Warren (D-MA)|
|Tillis (R-NC)||Whitehouse (D-RI)|
|Toomey (R-PA)||Wyden (D-OR)|
… Now I know the average parent spends a good deal their time on Facebook and other “look at me .. look at me” social media and can care less about such hard to understand things like I.T. Security.
BUT THESE ARE YOUR CHILDREN AND YOU NEED TO PROTECT THEM!
…sorry, as a parent, this stuff makes my blood boil. Look parents, you scour the pedophile databases for your neighborhood, but leave the barn door open on the Internet. If you think governmental entities are going to protect you, you are only fooling yourselves. Companies peddling these things are about making the maximum amount of money at the lowest possible cost. They will **NOT** invest in expensive and complex security. Why? they do not have to. By the time the breach is discovered, they have made there millions. And there is absolutely no teeth in any governmental mandates op provide security such that any really exist in the first place.
Ok, on with the story!
The personal information of more than half a million people who bought internet-connected fluffy animals has been compromised.
The details, which include email addresses and passwords, were leaked along with access to profile pictures and more than 2m voice recordings of children and adults who had used the CloudPets stuffed toys.
The US company’s toys can connect over Bluetooth to an app to allow a parent to upload or download audio messages for their child.
Of course the company denied it and shot at the messenger
CloudPets’s chief executive, Mark Myers, denied that voice recordings were stolen in a statement to NetworkWorld magazine. “Were voice recordings stolen? Absolutely not.” He added: “The headlines that say 2m messages were leaked on the internet are completely false.” Myers also told NetworkWorld that when Motherboard raised the issue with CloudPets, “we looked at it and thought it was a very minimal issue”. Myers added that a hacker would only be able to access the sound recordings if they managed to guess the password. When the Guardian tried to contact Myers on Tuesday, emails to CloudPets’s official contact address were returned as undeliverable.
Troy Hunt, owner of data breach monitoring service Have I Been Pwned, drew attention to the breach, which he first became aware of in mid-February. At that point, more than half a million records were being traded online. Hunt’s own source had first attempted to contact CloudPets in late December, but also received no response. While the database had been connected to the internet, it had more than 800,000 user records in it, suggesting that the data dump Hunt received is just a fraction of the full information potentially stolen.
The personal information was contained in a database connected directly to the internet, with no usernames or passwords preventing any visitor from accessing all the data. A week after Hunt’s contact first attempted to alert CloudPets, the original databases were deleted, and a ransom demand was left, and a week after that, no remaining databases were publicly accessible. CloudPets has not notified users of the hack.
Hunt argues the security flaws should undercut the entire premise of connected toys. “It only takes one little mistake on behalf of the data custodian – such as misconfiguring the database security – and every single piece of data they hold on you and your family can be in the public domain in mere minutes.
“If you’re fine with your kids’ recordings ending up in unexpected places then so be it, but that’s the assumption you have to work on because there’s a very real chance it’ll happen. There’s no doubt whatsoever in my mind that there are many other connected toys out there with serious security vulnerabilities in the services that sit behind them. Inevitably, some would already have been compromised and the data taken without the knowledge of the manufacturer or parents.”
John Madelin, CEO at IT security experts RelianceACSN, echoes Hunt’s warnings. “Connected toys that are easily accessible by hackers are sinister. The CloudPets issue highlights the fact that manufacturers of connected devices really struggle to bake security in from the start. The 2.2m voice recordings were stored online, but not securely, along with email addresses and passwords of 800,000 users, this is unforgivable.” Source: Guardian Article Here
Now for the technical, here are some tid-bits from the researcher. Full article here
Clearly, CloudPets weren’t just ignoring my contact, they simply weren’t even reading their emails”
There are references to almost 2.2 million voice recordings of parents and their children exposed by databases that should never have contained production data.
But then I dug a little deeper and took a look at the mobile app:
This app communicates with a website at spiraltoys.s.mready.net which is on a domain owned by Romanian company named mReady. That URL is bound to a server with IP address 184.108.40.206, the exact same address the exposed databases were on. That’s a production website there too because it’s the one the mobile app is hitting so in other words, the test and staging databases along with the production website were all sitting on the one box. The most feasible explanation I can come up with for this is that one of those databases is being used for production purposes and the other non-production (a testing environment, for example).
I am constantly evaluating browser add-ons and recently took a harder look at Ghostery. I notice that settings could not be saved when I closed the browser and then restarted. Why? Well it seems that Ghostery stores these in a cookie.
What a Cookie? Shame Shame Shame. **ALL** browsers should be set to dump cache and all cookies when you close it. Why? It helps greatly to prevent tracking and those targeted adverts among others.
What to use instead? A good and efficient ad-blocker. like uBlock I am also using uBlock Origin which appears to have a wider feature set and extra privacy settings. Both can be downloaded from your favorite browser ad-ons facility. Here are a few: Firefox is here, Chrome (yuk- you are google’s product, but if you insist) is here. Safari – not on their site, but uBlock is here. I cannot find the download for uBlock Origin. Post comment with link if you know it.
Direct uBlock Origin releases are here, but they may not be verify by the browser yet.
Trump: “I think we ought to get on with our lives. I think that computers have complicated lives very greatly. The whole age of computer has made it where nobody knows exactly what is going on. We have speed, we have a lot of other things, but I’m not sure we have the kind the security we need,” Trump said according to press pool report. He was at the Mar-a-Lago resort at the time of making the statement.” Source
Actually, I agree with Trump on this. We do not have the security we need. More fundamental to that, we do not have a mindset that puts computer security first. We bolt the front door and secure our physical premises with 24/7 monitoring services, yet we leave the barn door wide open for our online presence be it email, social media, browsing and shopping.
Privacy and security is an option when in fact it should come first. Imagine if the internet was built from the ground up with privacy and security as the foundation layer? That would mean no web bugs, tracking cookies, targeted advertising, privacy statements like Netflix’s (for example) that say, let me rape you and sell my experience and if you do not agree, your option is to cancel your subscription.
And home router manufacturers that make appliances so easily hacked it is a joke. And Microsoft windows that to this day facilitates users running with administrator privileges in everyday use. And the IoT – internet of things that have little if any security. And the mindset of the average consumer the allows Amazon’s Alexa into their home. Completely secure, right? Yeah sure, Why then, I ask, did this happen: “Amazon had been served with a search warrant in a murder case, as detectives in Bentonville, Ark., want to know what Alexa heard in the early morning hours of Nov. 22, 2015 — when Victor Collins was found dead in a hot tub behind a home after an Arkansas Razorbacks football game. (Read more) Come on! Lock the door, arm yourself to the teeth, **but** let a device with 7 microphones listening to every sound in your house connected to ?? and easily hacked by ?? (you’ll never know!). By the way, the same goes with Siri and Google voice on your smart phones.
Don’t blame the Russians, blame yourself. Yes, the mindset needs to change indeed.
Happy New Year.
Security watchers have warned of massive privacy problems with the Magic Kinder App for children.
A lack of encryption within the Magic Kinder smartphone app and other security shortcomings open the doors for all sorts of exploits, they claim.
Hacktive Security alleges that a malicious user could “read the chat of the children, send them messages, photographs and videos or change user proﬁle info such as date of birth and gender,” as explained in detail in a blog post here.
The Android app – which has clocked in at more than 500,000 downloads – was developed by a subsidiary of Ferrero International, the firm behind Nutella, Kinder and Ferrero Rocher.
The mobile software aims to offer “strategic, educational games and quizzes to improve children’s skills and development”.
Ferrero has yet to respond to a request for comment.
Joe Bursell, marketing manager at independent security consultancy Pen Test Partners, said that the app Magic Kinder App is riddled with basic security problems.
“These are not subtle, hard-to-find issues,” Bursell told El Reg. “You’d see those IDs in the proxy within minutes of testing and the first thing you would do is manually increment/decrement them.”
“There are no authorisation checks on any of the requests. This means that anyone can: send a message to your kids, read your family diary, and change other data about people, e.g. gender.”
“Also, it doesn’t use encryption,” Bursell added.
Probably laden with spyware to hoover up all sorts family data.
French data regulators have given Facebook three months to stop transferring data on French users to the US and to refrain from tracking nonusers.
PARIS — In yet another fissure between the US and Europe over digital privacy practices, French regulators ordered Facebook to curtail its online data collection practices.
The country’s data protection authority, known by its French acronym CNIL, ruled this week to give Facebook three months to stop transferring data on French users to the states and to refrain from collecting information about nonusers, or else face hefty fines.
There is an easier solution. Just stop using it. These slime balls track you whether you are a user or not. That said, anyone who disrespects their own privacy deserves what they get. Word of the day Insouciant -“Marked by blithe unconcern; nonchalant.” And it is not just users of Facebook and other social media, it is what we witness everyday in businesses when it comes to their IT security and their employee and customer’s privacy.
The Paris appeal court has upheld a ruling that Facebook can be sued under French – not Californian – law.
A French teacher won in the Paris high court last year, arguing that Facebook should not have suspended his account because of an erotic image on his page.
Facebook appealed against that ruling – but the appeal court has now upheld the criticism of Facebook’s user terms.
US-based Facebook says users can only sue in California. It removed a close-up of a nude woman, painted by Courbet.
The teacher, Frederic Durand-Baissas, argued that he had a right to post a link on Facebook with the image of the famous Gustave Courbet painting. The original 19th-Century work hangs in the Musee d’Orsay in Paris.
The teacher accused Facebook of censorship and said the social network should reinstate his account and pay him €20,000 (£15,521; $22,567) in damages. He sued the company in 2011.
It is seen as a test case, potentially paving the way for other lawsuits against Facebook outside US jurisdiction.
Facebook users have to agree to the tech giant’s terms of service, which state that its jurisdiction is California. About 22 million French people are on Facebook.
The Paris high court decided that the company’s argument was “abusive” and violated French consumer law, by making it difficult for people in France to sue.
The Facebook community standards say “we restrict the display of nudity because some audiences within our global community may be sensitive to this type of content – particularly because of their cultural background or age”.
Good work Frederic Durand-Baissas!